Occupy Montreal ‘splits’
Movement 99% emerges as an independent group aside from OM, their call: “99% has decided to act alone as we were cut off from finances and all from OM.”
By: Paula Monroy
On Thursday’s GA, December 8, Frederic Biron and Martin Nadir proposed that “50% of Occupy Montreal funds[…] be transferred to Quebec 99%”. Participants in the GA were unsure, and concerns were made particularly after proponents said “We talk about participatory democracy. Proponents would be willing to reintegrate to the GA if ‘functional'”. The proposal was withdrawn after an hour discussion. The result? An obvious ‘split’.
In a private discussion on facebook, Antoine De Grassilet, a Quebec 99% member explained, “99% has decided to act alone as we were cut off from finances and all from OM.”
“Unfortunately the GA”, he said, “has lost credibility and has been going on without quorum except for yesterday”. Also pointing that “The people were for OM at first but then as it dragged on the momentum was lost or getting lost in 1000s of different causes. The original 99% against 1% was getting taken over and no one could control the General assembly and the way it worked. That was great at first but then everyday decisions had to be passed and approved by the GA.”
But not everyone thinks the structure of the GA is the main problem.
“Many of the remaining “Occupy Montreal” occupiers have a deep wound from when these guys left in such a public way without talking to the GA first – they’ve never formally apologized for the results of this.” told Ben Godin to the blog, Journal Occupy Montreal.
A press conference was called on November 21 at 2:30pm without consulting the GA. Some of the people organizing it were members of the 99%group, telling the media that they were ready to move out of the park to begin phase 3 of the movement. Short after, the mayor requested occupants to leave.
What is the 99% focusing on?
De Grassilet proceeded, “[We] have decided to fight for the 3 causes that were most important at this time in order to reorient the debate: Students fees and solutions to prevent those; Plan Nord, which is basically giving away our wealth for pennies; and the problems of collusions and corruptions that have become widespread at all levels of governance.”
When asked about their structure De Grassilet proceeded, “We do not start voting or the such but the actions that are proposed are always either accepted or rejected, not in details but in the general form of the action. We are also working on the structure to allow people to work and word their opinion via the web but not in the raucous way of the discussion group.”
He also clarified, “It is open upon requesting to be added”.
Whatever happened with solidarity, hopefully this ‘split’ won’t last for too long. As the good old protest chant goes “The people united will never be defeated!”.